Patriot act constitutional research paper - Air Themes.

Political Cartoon Video Clip Mitt Romney speaks out about how the Patriot Act will prevent acts of terrorism. This political cartoon exhibits how people feel the Patriot Act allows the Government to spy on them. Conclusion In conclusion, the controversy over the Patriot Act.

An phrase, the PATRIOT Act, inside the words of Ronczkowski (2006, p. 64), is “formally known as the Centralizing and Building up America by giving Appropriate Equipment Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Action of 2001. “ Social implications of the U. T. A. PATRIOT Act and related legal guidelines limiting daily behaviors.

It is unconstitutional. The Patriot act goes against rights stated in the constitution and specifically goes against Amendment 4 which states that the police and government need a warrant or permission to search anything in your possession With the Patriot act they are breaking the terms specifically given to all Americans in the US constitution.

USA PATRIOT ACT A CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUE The USA Patriot Act A Constitutional Issue The USA Patriot Act A Constitutional Issue Introduction The U.S. legislation known as the Patriot Act became law on October 26, 2001, a little more than one month after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon (White, 2003).

The hypothesis of this paper, of the Patriot Act being in violation of the United States Constitution was thus correct and was proved through thorough analysis of Sections 505 and 215 of the Patriot Act and the First and Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution. (2011, January).

Like the “Patriot Act” which is as far from patriotic as it gets. And speaking of the Patriot Act, the government is now introducing what I’d like to dub the Pandemic Patriot Act 2.0. The DoJ has secretly asked Congress to draft legislation allowing them to indefinitely detain people without due process during the coronavirus pandemic.

The USA PATRIOT Act (commonly known as the Patriot Act) is an Act of the United States Congress that was signed into law by U.S. President George W. Bush on October 26, 2001. The title of the Act is a contrived three letter initialism (USA) preceding a seven letter acronym (PATRIOT), which in combination stand for Uniting and Strengthening.

On Monday April 4th, 2011 the House of Representatives reviewed the Patriot Act and voted to extend it to the 8th of December, giving the power to the Federal Bureau of Investigation and many other federal agencies to still use roving wiretaps among other powers that overstep our constitutional rights.

While the PATRIOT Act has drawn the ire of many U.S. citizens due to its far reaching effects, lack of jurisdictional or judicial boundaries, enhanced surveillance policies and direct violations to multiple constitutional amendments, under its protection, it has also been a highly successful piece of legislation with regards to both stopping and possibly deterring acts of terrorism within the.

The USA patriot act of 2001, the constitutional challenges and the court’s rulings on these challenges The USA PATRIOT ACT is an acronym standing for: “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act.”.

With the increased security in place, the government of this country implemented the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act, to put it simply allows the authorities to investigate and seize anything without proper permission and based on mere suspicion. It is a direct violation the 4th amendment of the constitution.

This SAFETY Act however, has caused much turmoil and debate among social strata thereby creating two distinct sides to the Patriot Act, one of the proponents while the other of the opponents. This analytical research paper will throw light upon the Patriot Act in general while highlighting its strengths as well as weaknesses.